Share this
USB, NAS, or Tape for Offsite Backup?
by Clay Levering on Mar 14, 2014 9:46:36 AM
In today’s small-to-medium business infrastructure the most commonly talked about backup destinations I hear from my customers are USB drives or a local NAS with tape backups coming in a relatively distant third. While there are pros and cons for all three, the immediate follow-up concern is offsite backup and what I would use. While both USB and NAS backup solutions can be used effectively to handle internal backups, offsite backups can become a hassle (or even a danger).
Tape however is very effective for offsite backup but is often a much more manual process than the USB or NAS configurations. Depending on the requirements, I might recommend any of the three (or even a combination of them). What follows below are some pros and cons of each type of backup medium:
USB Drives for Backup
Using a USB drive (or multiple drives) for backup purposes makes immediate sense. They are small in size, fairly energy efficient, and offer high portability. These devices can be picked up for some relatively incredible prices and are as difficult to configure as it is to get the USB plugged in on the right side on your first try. They utilize the same (or similar) file structure and style that your operating system already does and they often come with some limited software to help make sure they’re configured.
For offsite backups, just carry the USB drive out with you. However, USB drives have a relatively high failure rate due to the lack of stable housing (being tossed in your IT guy’s backpack for offsite storage). USB drives are also generally only available to the single machine you have them connected to. Additionally, not very many USB-only backup drives are configured to handle any kind of RAID configuration, which means there is little-to-no data protection on that drive itself.
Pros:
- Fairly cheap
- Highly available
- Easy-to-Configure / Understand
- Extremely portable
Cons:
- Prone to accidental damage
- Generally no built-in data redundancy
- Single-machine backup at a time
NAS Backup Drives
NAS drives for backup offer a higher level of drive-level protection from USB hard drives by implementing tools like RAID controllers and multiple redundant disks. They also add the ability to be more than a single peer-to-peer data transfer by utilizing CIFS / NFS network file shares. These extra features do come with a cost, however: generally a NAS unit is more expensive than a USB drive of equivalent storage sizes, network transfers will often take longer than a direct USB connection, and their physical size deters users from carrying them around like their smaller USB brothers.
In regards to offsite backups, a NAS is slightly more complex to configure and requires hardware / vendor support from the NAS you’re using to enable replication between an onsite and offsite NAS. This also requires the purchase of two nearly identical NAS drives and increases the cost. This also has its downfalls due to network connectivity speeds between the two devices in the initial transfer, but subsequent replications generally go fairly quickly. However, the best part about these NAS drives is their relative, “Set it and forget it” configuration once the initial configuration is done. Read about the Top 5 Reasons to Backup to NAS.
Pros:
- Helps prevent data loss from malfunctioning drives (RAID-5, etc)
- Can be the destination for multiple machines
- Once configured, highly automated
- Replication is very simple to maintain
Cons:
- Replication can be very difficult to configure / initialize
- Without replication feature, offsite backups become difficult
- More expensive than USB (especially with two devices for replication)
- Stable network required to work reliably
Tape Backup
Tape backup is about as legacy as you can get in the backup world. Started in 1951, tape backup has been around forever and for good reasons. They can be fast, they have a very low cost per gigabyte of data backed up, and the tapes themselves are relatively resistant to physical destruction. One of the drawbacks of tape backup is the relatively high price of entry. In my pricing it was approximately 50% more expensive than a single NAS drive. Another is the manual process required of inserting a tape, backing up the data (and switching tapes if necessary) and then removing the tape to take it home. Finally, these devices are generally a peer-to-peer connection like USB drives due to the way data is written to them.
For offsite backups, tape backup is hard to beat. The tapes are sturdy, drop-proof, and maintaining an offsite copy is as easy as making sure you have the latest tape backup sitting at home. My favorite answer to, “Why tape and not just a bunch of USB drives?” is: “Drop a box of tape backups down the stairs and drop a box of USB drives down the stairs, how much data do you have left?” With tape, that answer is significantly higher than USB will ever be. Download our Whitepaper on Tape Backup.
Pros:
- Highly proven technology
- Offsite backup is incredibly easy
- Physical damage significantly reduced
- Can be extremely fast
- Replacement media is very cheap comparatively
Cons:
- Single-machine backup at a time
- Manual backup process
- Price can be initially very large
- Tape drives require cleaning / maintenance
Conclusion: Which Backup Storage is the Best Solution?
As for which one I prefer? While tape makes the most sense from a business standpoint if there is a dedicated IT admin, I generally find that the NAS backup configuration will end up being more automated and less user-intensive for offsite backup. Removing complexity from a user’s day-to-day activities in regards to their backup helps ensure that they continue to be successfully performed. At the end of the day, what matters most to you: reliably consistent (but difficult to configure) backups or a simple backup that requires a relatively high level of user interaction. In my history, I’ll take a complex configuration instead of user interaction.
Share this
- Pre-Sales Questions (109)
- Tips and Tricks (96)
- Industry News (58)
- Reseller / MSP (37)
- Best Practices (31)
- Security Threats / Ransomware (29)
- Applications (26)
- Disaster Recovery (26)
- Cloud Backup (24)
- Compliance / HIPAA (24)
- Backup Videos (23)
- Storage Technology (23)
- Virtual Environments (17)
- Infographics (8)
- Technology Updates / Releases (8)
- Backup preparation (5)
- Products (US) (3)
- Company (US) (1)
- Events (1)
- Events (US) (1)
- January 2025 (1)
- December 2024 (1)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- August 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (1)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- May 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (1)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- March 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- September 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (1)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (1)
- January 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- November 2020 (1)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (2)
- December 2019 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (2)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (7)
- April 2016 (8)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (3)
- January 2016 (12)
- December 2015 (7)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (6)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (3)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (2)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (8)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (7)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (9)
- March 2014 (7)
- February 2014 (7)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (2)